header-logo header-logo

24 May 2018
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Small claims change not ‘proportionate’

nlj_7794_news

Plans to raise limit pose significant access to justice concerns, the Bar warns

Barristers have joined MPs on the Justice Committee in criticising government proposals to raise the threshold for small claims.

The MPs’ report, Small claims limit for personal injury, warned last week of significant access to justice concerns if plans to raise the small claims limit from £1,000 to £2,000 for employers’ liability and public liability claims, and to £5,000 for road traffic accident-related personal injury, go ahead. The change would be made by secondary legislation.

A Bar Council spokesperson said: ‘Many who suffer such injuries are not in a position to afford legal help, often because an accident has resulted in a loss of income, yet they will be up against large and well-resourced insurance firms.

‘The Justice Select Committee rightly points out that the likely impact of raising the small claims track will be a substantial increase in the number of unrepresented litigants. This will place further strain on the resources of already stretched court services.’

It supported the Justice Committee’s recommendation that the limit be raised to £1,500 instead as ‘a more reasonable and proportionate measure’.

Bob Neill MP, chair of the Justice Committee, said the proposed increase raises concerns about the ‘financial and procedural barriers that claimants might face’. Although the Ministry of Justice is developing an electronic platform to help unrepresented claimants, Neill said ‘we remain to be convinced that this will be effective or sufficient’.

The report’s recommendations include that the government work with the Association of British Insurers to provide reliable data and monitor the extent to which premium reductions can be attributed to these reforms, reporting back after 12 months. While the committee felt that fraudulent and exaggerated claims must be prevented, ‘the common law right to compensation for negligence applies regardless of the value of the claim’ and said that the government should not increase the small claims limit for RTA (road traffic accident) PI claims to £5,000.

It recommends delaying the national roll-out of the electronic platform until at least April 2020, and that the senior judiciary’s examination of McKenzie friends conclude as soon as possible.

Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll