header-logo header-logo

Small claims change not ‘proportionate’

24 May 2018
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7794_news

Plans to raise limit pose significant access to justice concerns, the Bar warns

Barristers have joined MPs on the Justice Committee in criticising government proposals to raise the threshold for small claims.

The MPs’ report, Small claims limit for personal injury, warned last week of significant access to justice concerns if plans to raise the small claims limit from £1,000 to £2,000 for employers’ liability and public liability claims, and to £5,000 for road traffic accident-related personal injury, go ahead. The change would be made by secondary legislation.

A Bar Council spokesperson said: ‘Many who suffer such injuries are not in a position to afford legal help, often because an accident has resulted in a loss of income, yet they will be up against large and well-resourced insurance firms.

‘The Justice Select Committee rightly points out that the likely impact of raising the small claims track will be a substantial increase in the number of unrepresented litigants. This will place further strain on the resources of already stretched court services.’

It supported the Justice Committee’s recommendation that the limit be raised to £1,500 instead as ‘a more reasonable and proportionate measure’.

Bob Neill MP, chair of the Justice Committee, said the proposed increase raises concerns about the ‘financial and procedural barriers that claimants might face’. Although the Ministry of Justice is developing an electronic platform to help unrepresented claimants, Neill said ‘we remain to be convinced that this will be effective or sufficient’.

The report’s recommendations include that the government work with the Association of British Insurers to provide reliable data and monitor the extent to which premium reductions can be attributed to these reforms, reporting back after 12 months. While the committee felt that fraudulent and exaggerated claims must be prevented, ‘the common law right to compensation for negligence applies regardless of the value of the claim’ and said that the government should not increase the small claims limit for RTA (road traffic accident) PI claims to £5,000.

It recommends delaying the national roll-out of the electronic platform until at least April 2020, and that the senior judiciary’s examination of McKenzie friends conclude as soon as possible.

Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll