header-logo header-logo

13 March 2019
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Small firms unprepared for Brexit

Fewer than one in ten solicitors at small law firms have made contingency plans for Brexit, according to the latest Bellwether research paper

The paper, ‘The Luxury of Uncertainty: Inaction in the face of Brexit’, published this week by LexisNexis UK, highlights overwhelming inaction to prepare for the UK’s departure in two weeks’ time. A further 20% of the 176 solicitors at small firms and small offices of large firms surveyed intend to make contingency plans in the next year or two, once the UK has left.

Despite their seemingly relaxed attitude, however, nearly half (47%) of those surveyed say they are worried about the instability of Brexit and the threat it will pose to their business.

‘Clearly, the uncertainty surrounding Brexit is a key factor in lawyers’ reticence to take concrete preparatory measures,’ said Jon Whittle, market development director, LexisNexis UK.

‘It is of course understandable as there is little clarity on what the future will look like. There is frustration among lawyers about not knowing what will happen down the line, however the industry isn’t complacent—instead, it seems that the mental bandwidth of those involved is overwhelmed by the industry specific challenges—ones they have been struggling to deal with for years already and are still significant today.’

Moreover, ‘independent lawyers have taken a “wait and watch” approach on the basis that their business is primarily UK-centric,’ Whittle says. About 95% of the work handled by the solicitors surveyed originates within the UK, and only one in five of the respondents have any legal involvement abroad.

Whittle adds, however, that ‘there is a business rationale for having Brexit contingency plans in place to at least limit unnecessary blows to the business in the long run. Brexit isn’t a momentary event, it will unfold through the transition period’.

More than a quarter of solicitors surveyed think Brexit will create opportunities for their firm, and nearly two-thirds (72%) say their firm actively embraces change. Overall, 91% of solicitors are confident about the future, while 78% think there may be rough times ahead but they will be able to adapt.

Issue: 7832 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll