header-logo header-logo

13 March 2019
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Small firms unprepared for Brexit

Fewer than one in ten solicitors at small law firms have made contingency plans for Brexit, according to the latest Bellwether research paper

The paper, ‘The Luxury of Uncertainty: Inaction in the face of Brexit’, published this week by LexisNexis UK, highlights overwhelming inaction to prepare for the UK’s departure in two weeks’ time. A further 20% of the 176 solicitors at small firms and small offices of large firms surveyed intend to make contingency plans in the next year or two, once the UK has left.

Despite their seemingly relaxed attitude, however, nearly half (47%) of those surveyed say they are worried about the instability of Brexit and the threat it will pose to their business.

‘Clearly, the uncertainty surrounding Brexit is a key factor in lawyers’ reticence to take concrete preparatory measures,’ said Jon Whittle, market development director, LexisNexis UK.

‘It is of course understandable as there is little clarity on what the future will look like. There is frustration among lawyers about not knowing what will happen down the line, however the industry isn’t complacent—instead, it seems that the mental bandwidth of those involved is overwhelmed by the industry specific challenges—ones they have been struggling to deal with for years already and are still significant today.’

Moreover, ‘independent lawyers have taken a “wait and watch” approach on the basis that their business is primarily UK-centric,’ Whittle says. About 95% of the work handled by the solicitors surveyed originates within the UK, and only one in five of the respondents have any legal involvement abroad.

Whittle adds, however, that ‘there is a business rationale for having Brexit contingency plans in place to at least limit unnecessary blows to the business in the long run. Brexit isn’t a momentary event, it will unfold through the transition period’.

More than a quarter of solicitors surveyed think Brexit will create opportunities for their firm, and nearly two-thirds (72%) say their firm actively embraces change. Overall, 91% of solicitors are confident about the future, while 78% think there may be rough times ahead but they will be able to adapt.

Issue: 7832 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll