header-logo header-logo

Snooper’s charter “falls short”

07 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers have expressed concerns about the impact on lawyer-client confidentiality as a result of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016—the so-called “snooper’s charter”.

The Act, which covers state surveillance, received Royal Assent last month. Both the Law Society and the Bar Council campaigned for legal professional privilege to be given statutory protection in the Act through express recognition of its importance and provisions making it unlawful to deliberately target legally privileged communications.

This was not achieved. However, late amendments to the Bill in the House of Lords introduced “additional safeguards” strengthening requirements to destroy legally privileged material caught by surveillance. Such materials must now be destroyed unless it is in the public interest that they be kept. A code of practice will also be drawn up.

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, chairman of the Bar, said: “Despite claims that the Investigatory Powers Act offers new protections for legally privileged material, sadly the Act falls significantly short of what we would consider sufficient to protect this important and fundamental right which underpins the rule of law. 

“We expect that draft codes of practice will be published in due course to give operational guidance to authorities. The Bar Council will scrutinise closely these draft codes, which ultimately must be approved by Parliament.”

Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
David Bailey-Vella of Davis Woolfe and chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers explores the new costs budgeting light pilot scheme in this week's NLJ
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
back-to-top-scroll