header-logo header-logo

Snooper’s charter “falls short”

07 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers have expressed concerns about the impact on lawyer-client confidentiality as a result of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016—the so-called “snooper’s charter”.

The Act, which covers state surveillance, received Royal Assent last month. Both the Law Society and the Bar Council campaigned for legal professional privilege to be given statutory protection in the Act through express recognition of its importance and provisions making it unlawful to deliberately target legally privileged communications.

This was not achieved. However, late amendments to the Bill in the House of Lords introduced “additional safeguards” strengthening requirements to destroy legally privileged material caught by surveillance. Such materials must now be destroyed unless it is in the public interest that they be kept. A code of practice will also be drawn up.

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, chairman of the Bar, said: “Despite claims that the Investigatory Powers Act offers new protections for legally privileged material, sadly the Act falls significantly short of what we would consider sufficient to protect this important and fundamental right which underpins the rule of law. 

“We expect that draft codes of practice will be published in due course to give operational guidance to authorities. The Bar Council will scrutinise closely these draft codes, which ultimately must be approved by Parliament.”

Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll