header-logo header-logo

Solicitors feeling the squeeze at both ends of the profession

25 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Partners are delaying retirement because of recent cuts in pension saving for high earners, creating a bottleneck at the senior end of the profession, according to research by accountants Smith & Williamson.

Its 21st Annual Survey of the Professional Services Sector shows that more than half of the partners questioned expect a rise in the retirement age to affect opportunities for partner development and hence succession planning. The accountants also report that 90% of the 95 firms surveyed leave individual partners to organise their own retirement planning.

Mike Fosberry, director at Smith & Williamson, said: “It is in firms’ own interests to support partners in making personal financial arrangements.”

At the other end of the spectrum, the Law Society has expressed concern that a new qualifying exam, Solicitors Qualifying Examination, could result in lower standards and reduce access to the profession.

Jonathan Smithers, Law Society President, said access would only be increased if training providers developed cheaper and more flexible courses: “Our concern is that the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) consultation contains little detail on the proposed assessments.” He accused the SRA of “making piecemeal announcements to the profession on its proposals. This is unhelpful and causing grave concern.”

However, Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: “All parties agree there is a problem caused by an inability to measure standards across providers. What we are proposing is a single assessment that we think will ensure, for the first time, consistent high standards of entry into the profession, regardless of pathway into the profession. This is a high-level consultation and we want to hear from as many interested parties as possible on the key issues.”

Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll