header-logo header-logo

25 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors feeling the squeeze at both ends of the profession

Partners are delaying retirement because of recent cuts in pension saving for high earners, creating a bottleneck at the senior end of the profession, according to research by accountants Smith & Williamson.

Its 21st Annual Survey of the Professional Services Sector shows that more than half of the partners questioned expect a rise in the retirement age to affect opportunities for partner development and hence succession planning. The accountants also report that 90% of the 95 firms surveyed leave individual partners to organise their own retirement planning.

Mike Fosberry, director at Smith & Williamson, said: “It is in firms’ own interests to support partners in making personal financial arrangements.”

At the other end of the spectrum, the Law Society has expressed concern that a new qualifying exam, Solicitors Qualifying Examination, could result in lower standards and reduce access to the profession.

Jonathan Smithers, Law Society President, said access would only be increased if training providers developed cheaper and more flexible courses: “Our concern is that the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) consultation contains little detail on the proposed assessments.” He accused the SRA of “making piecemeal announcements to the profession on its proposals. This is unhelpful and causing grave concern.”

However, Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: “All parties agree there is a problem caused by an inability to measure standards across providers. What we are proposing is a single assessment that we think will ensure, for the first time, consistent high standards of entry into the profession, regardless of pathway into the profession. This is a high-level consultation and we want to hear from as many interested parties as possible on the key issues.”

Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll