header-logo header-logo

22 July 2020 / Shane Crawford
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Features , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Sponsorship, risk assessment & a duty to comply

24644
Shane Crawford highlights the complex situation of sponsoring an immigrant worker during the pandemic
  • Tensions between latest government advice for sponsors of immigrant workers: what are the implications for sponsors regarding right to work and possible termination of employment?

Current focus for commentary in employment law has been on the effect of certain principles on the employment relationship for domestic workers.

Included in the recent guidelines issued by the government were provisions for employers of immigrant workers for whom the employer has assigned a Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS)—Government COVID-19 advice (https://bit.ly/3cNsy9t).

This in summary states that during the present lockdown a sponsor may employ a worker if:

  • certificate of sponsorship is assigned;
  • the worker submitted an immigration application before expiry of previous leave (so not an overstayer); and
  • the role for which a worker is employed is the same as in the certificate of sponsorship.

But the advice goes on to state that the employer must dismiss if the immigration application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll