header-logo header-logo

Sponsorship, risk assessment & a duty to comply

22 July 2020 / Shane Crawford
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Features , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
24644
Shane Crawford highlights the complex situation of sponsoring an immigrant worker during the pandemic
  • Tensions between latest government advice for sponsors of immigrant workers: what are the implications for sponsors regarding right to work and possible termination of employment?

Current focus for commentary in employment law has been on the effect of certain principles on the employment relationship for domestic workers.

Included in the recent guidelines issued by the government were provisions for employers of immigrant workers for whom the employer has assigned a Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS)—Government COVID-19 advice (https://bit.ly/3cNsy9t).

This in summary states that during the present lockdown a sponsor may employ a worker if:

  • certificate of sponsorship is assigned;
  • the worker submitted an immigration application before expiry of previous leave (so not an overstayer); and
  • the role for which a worker is employed is the same as in the certificate of sponsorship.

But the advice goes on to state that the employer must dismiss if the immigration application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll