header-logo header-logo

22 July 2020 / Shane Crawford
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Features , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Sponsorship, risk assessment & a duty to comply

24644
Shane Crawford highlights the complex situation of sponsoring an immigrant worker during the pandemic
  • Tensions between latest government advice for sponsors of immigrant workers: what are the implications for sponsors regarding right to work and possible termination of employment?

Current focus for commentary in employment law has been on the effect of certain principles on the employment relationship for domestic workers.

Included in the recent guidelines issued by the government were provisions for employers of immigrant workers for whom the employer has assigned a Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS)—Government COVID-19 advice (https://bit.ly/3cNsy9t).

This in summary states that during the present lockdown a sponsor may employ a worker if:

  • certificate of sponsorship is assigned;
  • the worker submitted an immigration application before expiry of previous leave (so not an overstayer); and
  • the role for which a worker is employed is the same as in the certificate of sponsorship.

But the advice goes on to state that the employer must dismiss if the immigration application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll