header-logo header-logo

On the spot

Employers are appealing against civil penalties for employing illegal workers. Mark Tempest reports

* * * * * *

The civil penalty regime introduced by the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 (IANA 2006) celebrated its first birthday on 1 March 2009. IANA 2006 allows the UK Border Agency (UKBA) to issue penalty notices against employers who employ a person in breach of immigration law. Employers face a maximum penalty of £10,000 per illegal worker. The total amount of penalties issued is already over £14m.

IANA 2006 sets out a three-stage process. It allows UKBA to impose a penalty, it allows a penalised employer to object to the penalty via an internal review, and it provides for an appeal to the county court. The appeal is the only way of challenging the penalty in law.

Appeals under IANA 2006 are governed by Pt 52 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which is supplemented by a lengthy practice direction. Compliance with the practice direction is mandatory.

Pt 52 discourages appeals from judicial decisions by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll