header-logo header-logo

On the spot

Employers are appealing against civil penalties for employing illegal workers. Mark Tempest reports

* * * * * *

The civil penalty regime introduced by the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 (IANA 2006) celebrated its first birthday on 1 March 2009. IANA 2006 allows the UK Border Agency (UKBA) to issue penalty notices against employers who employ a person in breach of immigration law. Employers face a maximum penalty of £10,000 per illegal worker. The total amount of penalties issued is already over £14m.

IANA 2006 sets out a three-stage process. It allows UKBA to impose a penalty, it allows a penalised employer to object to the penalty via an internal review, and it provides for an appeal to the county court. The appeal is the only way of challenging the penalty in law.

Appeals under IANA 2006 are governed by Pt 52 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which is supplemented by a lengthy practice direction. Compliance with the practice direction is mandatory.

Pt 52 discourages appeals from judicial decisions by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll