header-logo header-logo

SRA's name and shame policy "will help no one"

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

News

The Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) “naming and shaming” policy will drive up costs and sour the regulator’s relationship with practitioners, lawyers say.

It is understood that the SRA will start publishing misconduct information on its website within months, although the policy only applies to investigations started after 1 January 2008.

Graham Reid, an employed barrister with Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, says the policy will increase the scope, and therefore the volume, of published instances of solicitors’ misconduct as much as 17-fold.
Until now, only the most serious examples of solicitors’ misconduct were reported in the Law Society’s Gazette and website. This will be extended to minor “internal” reprimands and rebukes administered by the SRA, decisions to prosecute at the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and the imposition of practising certificate conditions.

Reid says: “Many solicitors will be so alarmed at the prospect of personalised adverse publicity that they will be much more aggressive in their responses to an investigation by the SRA. Appeals from adjudication decisions will be more likely. Costs will rise.

“What clients need is relevant information about the overall quality of performance of solicitors and firms, not a catalogue of minor misconduct offences. As for solicitors, the risk of publication will introduce further and harmful antagonism into their relationship with the SRA. This policy is unlikely to help anyone.”

Reid adds that the routine publication of misconduct offences will not allow the public to distinguish between matters that are truly embarrassing for the firm and those that are not. “The signal will be lost in the noise,” he says.
Antony Townsend, SRA chief executive, says consumers have a right to know about the regulatory records of solicitors who have broken the rules. “This policy should enhance our relationship with solicitors, who will be able to see that we regulate proportionately. The fact that little information about solicitors in trouble has been published in the past is hardly an argument for not making the information available in the future,” he adds.
 

Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll