header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Sterilisation ruling in “best interests”

The High Court’s landmark approval of the sterilisation of a man with learning difficulties will not be a “green light” for other cases, the solicitor for the Trust involved in the case has said.

Mrs Justice Eleanor King ordered that it was lawful for doctors to perform a vasectomy on the man, DE, who lacks capacity to make decisions on contraception, as this was “overwhelmingly in DE’s best interests”.
The 36-year-old has an IQ of 40, equivalent to the mental age of a six to nine year-old child. He has a long-term girlfriend who also has learning disabilities and who became pregnant in 2009.

Neil Ward, partner at Browne Jacobson, who acted for the Applicant Trust, said: “It is a judgment which is very clearly restricted to its facts and should not in any way be perceived as giving a green light to large numbers of sterilisations of patients with learning disabilities.” (read full comment online at http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/protection-matters)

Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll