header-logo header-logo

Sterilisation ruling in “best interests”

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

The High Court’s landmark approval of the sterilisation of a man with learning difficulties will not be a “green light” for other cases, the solicitor for the Trust involved in the case has said.

Mrs Justice Eleanor King ordered that it was lawful for doctors to perform a vasectomy on the man, DE, who lacks capacity to make decisions on contraception, as this was “overwhelmingly in DE’s best interests”.
The 36-year-old has an IQ of 40, equivalent to the mental age of a six to nine year-old child. He has a long-term girlfriend who also has learning disabilities and who became pregnant in 2009.

Neil Ward, partner at Browne Jacobson, who acted for the Applicant Trust, said: “It is a judgment which is very clearly restricted to its facts and should not in any way be perceived as giving a green light to large numbers of sterilisations of patients with learning disabilities.” (read full comment online at http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/protection-matters)

Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll