header-logo header-logo

A sting in the tail

14 December 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
istock_000021405087medium_4

Ian Smith reviews recent employment law decisions

Three cases this month concern important issues on dismissal law. The first and third are on old law, one concerning common law contractual liability (with a nasty sting in the tail) and the other concerning disciplinary warnings which contains a very useful resume by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) president. The second case concerns another employment law immutable, the range of reasonable responses test for unfair dismissal, but with a modern twist to the arguments.

A cautionary tale

The decision of Briggs J in Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 201 (Nov) concerning the unlawful disciplining and demotion of a housing manager because of an outside-work Facebook posting criticising proposals for same-sex marriage as “an equality too far” was widely reported in the press and, moreover, it contains a very interesting application (to the claimant’s great disadvantage on damages) of one of the more esoteric elements of employment law, the rule in Hogg v Dover College

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll