header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A sting in the tail

istock_000021405087medium_4

Ian Smith reviews recent employment law decisions

Three cases this month concern important issues on dismissal law. The first and third are on old law, one concerning common law contractual liability (with a nasty sting in the tail) and the other concerning disciplinary warnings which contains a very useful resume by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) president. The second case concerns another employment law immutable, the range of reasonable responses test for unfair dismissal, but with a modern twist to the arguments.

A cautionary tale

The decision of Briggs J in Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 201 (Nov) concerning the unlawful disciplining and demotion of a housing manager because of an outside-work Facebook posting criticising proposals for same-sex marriage as “an equality too far” was widely reported in the press and, moreover, it contains a very interesting application (to the claimant’s great disadvantage on damages) of one of the more esoteric elements of employment law, the rule in Hogg v Dover College

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll