header-logo header-logo

A sting in the tail

14 December 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
istock_000021405087medium_4

Ian Smith reviews recent employment law decisions

Three cases this month concern important issues on dismissal law. The first and third are on old law, one concerning common law contractual liability (with a nasty sting in the tail) and the other concerning disciplinary warnings which contains a very useful resume by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) president. The second case concerns another employment law immutable, the range of reasonable responses test for unfair dismissal, but with a modern twist to the arguments.

A cautionary tale

The decision of Briggs J in Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 201 (Nov) concerning the unlawful disciplining and demotion of a housing manager because of an outside-work Facebook posting criticising proposals for same-sex marriage as “an equality too far” was widely reported in the press and, moreover, it contains a very interesting application (to the claimant’s great disadvantage on damages) of one of the more esoteric elements of employment law, the rule in Hogg v Dover College

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll