header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Stop & search: In search of improvement

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
11 November 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Procedure & practice , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
31571
Neil Parpworth reports on the latest stop and search figures and calls for an intelligence led approach

In brief

  • Stop and search powers: PACE and associated legislation.
  • Headline figures: a significant increase in recorded stop and searches.
  • Impact of the pandemic: making greater use of powers?

Each year, towards the end of October, the Home Office publishes statistical data relating to the use of certain statutory powers by police forces in England and Wales. The period covered by the data adopts a financial year approach, ie the year ending 31 March. For present purposes, the focus of the discussion will be on the data relating to police use of powers to stop and search in 2019/20.

The powers

For data collection purposes, stop and searches are categorised as being made under either: s 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and associated legislation, eg s 23(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971; s 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll