header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 November 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Procedure & practice , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Stop & search: In search of improvement

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
31571
Neil Parpworth reports on the latest stop and search figures and calls for an intelligence led approach

In brief

  • Stop and search powers: PACE and associated legislation.
  • Headline figures: a significant increase in recorded stop and searches.
  • Impact of the pandemic: making greater use of powers?

Each year, towards the end of October, the Home Office publishes statistical data relating to the use of certain statutory powers by police forces in England and Wales. The period covered by the data adopts a financial year approach, ie the year ending 31 March. For present purposes, the focus of the discussion will be on the data relating to police use of powers to stop and search in 2019/20.

The powers

For data collection purposes, stop and searches are categorised as being made under either: s 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and associated legislation, eg s 23(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971; s 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll