header-logo header-logo

04 December 2015 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

web_backpage_2

That’s entertainment: Dominic Regan goes behind the scenes of showbiz legal wranglings

The entertainment industry has generated a disproportionate number of bitter claims. The reason is simple: money. A successful song, film or entertainer can pull in millions and royalties accrue for decades beyond. Disputes go to court and can reveal astonishing tales.

Go for gross

One lesson for every adviser is not to agree a deal whereby your client is to receive a percentage of net profits. Those taking the money will seek to subtract every conceivable overhead so as to reduce the size of the fund upon which the percentage is calculated. Best advice is to go instead for a cut of the gross takings, a figure which is readily ascertainable!

Seeing red

Sometimes it is the entertainer who is found to be in the wrong. Chris “Top Gear” Evans was involved in a vicious High Court action which he instituted arising out of his antics while working as a DJ for Virgin Radio. In Evans v SMG Ltd [2003] EWHC 1423 (Ch), [2003]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll