header-logo header-logo

21 September 2012 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Striking a balance

Does UK plc have the right to strike? Tom Walker reports

In 2009 and 2010 a series of judgments upheld injunctions against strikes called by trade unions. The union movement complained that these were based on the unnecessarily complex balloting technicalities of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992). 

Indeed, in 2007 the Labour MP John McDonnell had sought to amend sections of TULR(C)A 1992 but failed in parliament, having been “talked out”.

Conversely, in 2011 when a series of strike ballots took place in the then feared “autumn of discontent” the business community, led by the CBI and Boris Johnson, noted that the turnout in some of these ballots were extremely low, often much less than 50%.

They called for a qualified majority of union members to take part in a ballot for it to be valid.  In April 2011 a Private Members Bill put forward by Dominic Raab proposed majority support for a strike ballot.  The motion was rejected.

More recent court decisions over strike injunctions suggest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll