header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

DOMICILE >>
RESIDENCE >>
CAPITAL GAINS TAX >>

OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS

It is no surprise to find that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is flexing its muscles with the banks and is doing its best to extend their reach for information beyond the five major UK banks where it had such success earlier this year. It is reported that they have had “exploratory” talks with 170 banks (this is odd—the last announcement said they were approaching 500) to assist them in deciding what to do next.

HMRC must be hard at work examining all the disclosure notifications which it received prior to 22 June and it will be even busier after 26 November, which is the date by which all the details must be delivered and the tax paid. It has until 30 April 2008 to decide whether or not to accept the disclosures and charge the reduced penalty or whether to start an enquiry into the taxpayer’s affairs. I expect that those who missed the June deadline or who miss the November deadline are in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll