header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

DOMICILE >>
RESIDENCE >>
CAPITAL GAINS TAX >>

OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS

It is no surprise to find that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is flexing its muscles with the banks and is doing its best to extend their reach for information beyond the five major UK banks where it had such success earlier this year. It is reported that they have had “exploratory” talks with 170 banks (this is odd—the last announcement said they were approaching 500) to assist them in deciding what to do next.

HMRC must be hard at work examining all the disclosure notifications which it received prior to 22 June and it will be even busier after 26 November, which is the date by which all the details must be delivered and the tax paid. It has until 30 April 2008 to decide whether or not to accept the disclosures and charge the reduced penalty or whether to start an enquiry into the taxpayer’s affairs. I expect that those who missed the June deadline or who miss the November deadline are in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll