header-logo header-logo

Taxing times

06 November 2014 / Spencer Keen
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Features , Tax , Employment
printer mail-detail
keen_0

Spencer Keen outlines some valuable guidance about the tax treatment of termination payments

Mr Moorthy received a payment of £200,000 in a compromise agreement after he was made redundant from his employment as executive director of operations with Jacobs Engineering UK Ltd (Jacobs) on 12 March 2010. He claimed that the £200,000 was not taxable because it had been paid to settle a discrimination claim.

HM Revenue & Customs did not accept that the entire settlement was tax free. HMRC argued that, with the exception of £60,000, the whole sum was taxable as a termination payment under s 401 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions Act) 2003 (ITEPA 2003). HMRC accepted that £60,000 was exempt from tax because, according to them, £30,000 was specifically exempted as a result of s 403 of ITEPA 2003 and another £30,000 was exempted because it represented compensation for injury to feelings. As a result, on 13 August 2013 HMRC issued a closure notice indicating that Moorthy’s self-assessment had been amended to include £140,023 of taxable income. Moorthy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll