header-logo header-logo

Taxing times

06 November 2014 / Spencer Keen
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Features , Tax , Employment
printer mail-detail
keen_0

Spencer Keen outlines some valuable guidance about the tax treatment of termination payments

Mr Moorthy received a payment of £200,000 in a compromise agreement after he was made redundant from his employment as executive director of operations with Jacobs Engineering UK Ltd (Jacobs) on 12 March 2010. He claimed that the £200,000 was not taxable because it had been paid to settle a discrimination claim.

HM Revenue & Customs did not accept that the entire settlement was tax free. HMRC argued that, with the exception of £60,000, the whole sum was taxable as a termination payment under s 401 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions Act) 2003 (ITEPA 2003). HMRC accepted that £60,000 was exempt from tax because, according to them, £30,000 was specifically exempted as a result of s 403 of ITEPA 2003 and another £30,000 was exempted because it represented compensation for injury to feelings. As a result, on 13 August 2013 HMRC issued a closure notice indicating that Moorthy’s self-assessment had been amended to include £140,023 of taxable income. Moorthy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll