header-logo header-logo

06 November 2014 / Spencer Keen
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Features , Tax , Employment
printer mail-detail

Taxing times

keen_0

Spencer Keen outlines some valuable guidance about the tax treatment of termination payments

Mr Moorthy received a payment of £200,000 in a compromise agreement after he was made redundant from his employment as executive director of operations with Jacobs Engineering UK Ltd (Jacobs) on 12 March 2010. He claimed that the £200,000 was not taxable because it had been paid to settle a discrimination claim.

HM Revenue & Customs did not accept that the entire settlement was tax free. HMRC argued that, with the exception of £60,000, the whole sum was taxable as a termination payment under s 401 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions Act) 2003 (ITEPA 2003). HMRC accepted that £60,000 was exempt from tax because, according to them, £30,000 was specifically exempted as a result of s 403 of ITEPA 2003 and another £30,000 was exempted because it represented compensation for injury to feelings. As a result, on 13 August 2013 HMRC issued a closure notice indicating that Moorthy’s self-assessment had been amended to include £140,023 of taxable income. Moorthy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll