header-logo header-logo

06 December 2007
Issue: 7300 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

TEMP TRUMPS

In brief

The EU’s proposed new rights for temporary workers will become law, despite UK objections. The European Council has been discussing a new Directive on agency workers since 2002, which would give temps in the UK the right to equal treatment with a comparable permanent employee on issues such as pay, maternity rights and protection against discrimination. Most EU states back these proposals, meaning they could be forced through under qualified-majority voting. Only the governments in Britain, Ireland, Germany and Denmark still object. Employers claim the rights would deter companies from hiring agency workers for busy periods or one-off projects.

Issue: 7300 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll