header-logo header-logo

"Tesco law" delay

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The licensing of alternative business structures (ABS) for lawyers, which had been due to take place on 6 October, has been delayed

The legal profession has for years been preparing for the arrival of ABS, dubbed “Tesco law”, which allow non-lawyers to own and invest in law firms. Supermarket chains, high street banks and insurers are expected to enter the legal services sector—a radical shake-up of the market that has prompted fears among many existing law firms that they will find it difficult to compete.

However, the Ministry of Justice told the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) this week that the deadline for Parliamentary approval processes to be completed will not now be met. Consequently, the SRA will not be a designated licensing authority for ABS on 6 October, as planned.

SRA chief executive, Antony Townsend said: “We were on track to license ABS from 6 October, so it is disappointing to learn that we will not be able to do so.

“We will work with the Ministry of Justice to do all we can to speed up the process. But we are in the hands of the parliamentary timetable. It seems unlikely that we will be able to license ABS much before the end of the year, and we shall make further announcements as soon as we have more certainty.”

Townsend said the introduction of outcomes-focused regulation, including the new Code of Conduct, will go ahead as scheduled on 6 October.
 

Issue: 7476 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll