header-logo header-logo

20 May 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-detail

The (special) COVID catastrophe

21104
We’re living in extraordinary times…but are these special circumstances, asks Charles Pigott.
  • The courts have traditionally taken a restrictive approach to the special circumstances defence in the context of collective redundancies.
  • Are they likely to be more generous in the context of the coronavirus pandemic?

In one of the strange ironies of employment law, the leading authority on the special circumstances defence goes back to a routine bakery business insolvency in the 1970s: Clarks of Hove v Bakers Union [1978] IRLR 366, [1979] 1 All ER 152.

The defence can be deployed to relieve an employer from some of the collective information and consultation requirements which are triggered by a proposal to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at one establishment within 90 days.

Clarks looked at the wording which is now found in s 188(7) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992: ‘If in any case there are special circumstances which render it not reasonably practicable for the employer to comply with a requirement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll