header-logo header-logo

The assault on liberty updated

14 January 2022 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail
68391
Michael Zander QC considers the Justice Secretary’s plans for a modern Bill of Rights

In 2009, Dominic Raab then a youngish lawyer, a year before becoming an MP, wrote The assault on liberty—what went wrong with rights? (Fourth Estate). It urged that, while remaining a member of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Human Rights Act 1998 (the Act) should be replaced by a British Bill of Rights to ‘focus our judiciary on its primary task, which is to give effect to British rights instead of trying to divine and decipher the murky case law emanating from Strasbourg’.

No one could sensibly have imagined then that a little over a decade later Raab would be Justice Secretary, (pictured) heading government decision-making on reforming the Act.

What’s proposed?

On 14 December 2021, the Justice Secretary published ‘Human Rights Act reforma modern Bill of Rights’, a consultation paper setting out the government’s proposals and inviting answers to 29 questions by 8 March. On the same day, he published

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll