header-logo header-logo

The individual under international criminal law (Pt 2)

131264
How is international criminal law enforced today, & how might it be applied to contemporary war criminals? Simon Parsons weighs up the options
  • Under the Rome Statute, the International Criminal Court has jurisdiction over the four core crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression.
  • It is feasible that Vladimir Putin and other war criminals could be put on trial for these crimes, and there have been calls for the creation of a special tribunal for the punishment of the crime of aggression against Ukraine.

The principle of individual liability for international crimes was established after World War II with the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, which prosecuted and convicted Nazi and Japanese war criminals culpable for criminal wars (covered in Pt 1, NLJ, 14 July 2023, pp13-14). International criminal law places culpability on human beings and not on organisations or states. This law prescribes and punishes acts that amount to international crimes. International criminal law is part of public international

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll