header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
21 July 2023 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , International justice
printer mail-detail

The individual under international criminal law (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
131264
How is international criminal law enforced today, & how might it be applied to contemporary war criminals? Simon Parsons weighs up the options
  • Under the Rome Statute, the International Criminal Court has jurisdiction over the four core crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression.
  • It is feasible that Vladimir Putin and other war criminals could be put on trial for these crimes, and there have been calls for the creation of a special tribunal for the punishment of the crime of aggression against Ukraine.

The principle of individual liability for international crimes was established after World War II with the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, which prosecuted and convicted Nazi and Japanese war criminals culpable for criminal wars (covered in Pt 1, NLJ, 14 July 2023, pp13-14). International criminal law places culpability on human beings and not on organisations or states. This law prescribes and punishes acts that amount to international crimes. International criminal law is part of public international

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll