header-logo header-logo

The insurance people don’t know they have

13 July 2021
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
Legal expenses insurance is rarely used by consumers and should be more widely promoted as a solution to unmet legal needs, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has said

It launched research this week, ‘Legal expenses insurance’, showing most people assume legal expenses insurance is more expensive and restrictive than it actually is. For example, one third believed the cost of home legal expenses insurance to be at least double the typical cost of about £20-£30 per year.

According to the Financial Conduct Authority, about 15 million people have legal expenses insurance. However, the LSB researchers found that many people don’t even know they have it.

The study involved a week-long online forum with a demographically mixed group of 46 adults in March.

Steve Brooker, the LSB’s head of policy development, said legal expenses insurance ‘has the potential to protect more people from unexpected legal costs and is cheaper and covers more issues than many consumers think’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll