header-logo header-logo

The insurance people don’t know they have

13 July 2021
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
Legal expenses insurance is rarely used by consumers and should be more widely promoted as a solution to unmet legal needs, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has said

It launched research this week, ‘Legal expenses insurance’, showing most people assume legal expenses insurance is more expensive and restrictive than it actually is. For example, one third believed the cost of home legal expenses insurance to be at least double the typical cost of about £20-£30 per year.

According to the Financial Conduct Authority, about 15 million people have legal expenses insurance. However, the LSB researchers found that many people don’t even know they have it.

The study involved a week-long online forum with a demographically mixed group of 46 adults in March.

Steve Brooker, the LSB’s head of policy development, said legal expenses insurance ‘has the potential to protect more people from unexpected legal costs and is cheaper and covers more issues than many consumers think’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
back-to-top-scroll