header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 September 2020 / Fiona Bawdon
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The Legal Education Foundation: Jolly good fellows

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
26582
Paths to social justice law: Fiona Bawdon explains why Justice First Fellows sign up to change the world
  • The Justice First Fellowship scheme.
  • The earnings gap.
  • The law of ‘everyday life’.
  • Political motivations.

For public law barrister Ollie Persey, it was a foot and mouth outbreak; for social welfare solicitor Mark McDonald Loncke, it was street homelessness; for children’s rights solicitor Karolina Rychlickla, it was the fall of communism.

These are just some of the reasons cited by Justice First Fellows for why they chose a career in social justice law, despite the multiple challenges facing this sector after years of under investment.

Fellowship scheme

The Justice First Fellowship scheme was set up in 2014 by the grant-giving charity Legal Education Foundation as a response to fears that the supply of new entrants into social justice law was drying up. Financially straitened organisations could no longer afford to take on trainees, leading to predictions of a looming skills gap. To date, TLEF has funded over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll