header-logo header-logo

The Legal Education Foundation: Jolly good fellows

02 September 2020 / Fiona Bawdon
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
26582
Paths to social justice law: Fiona Bawdon explains why Justice First Fellows sign up to change the world
  • The Justice First Fellowship scheme.
  • The earnings gap.
  • The law of ‘everyday life’.
  • Political motivations.

For public law barrister Ollie Persey, it was a foot and mouth outbreak; for social welfare solicitor Mark McDonald Loncke, it was street homelessness; for children’s rights solicitor Karolina Rychlickla, it was the fall of communism.

These are just some of the reasons cited by Justice First Fellows for why they chose a career in social justice law, despite the multiple challenges facing this sector after years of under investment.

Fellowship scheme

The Justice First Fellowship scheme was set up in 2014 by the grant-giving charity Legal Education Foundation as a response to fears that the supply of new entrants into social justice law was drying up. Financially straitened organisations could no longer afford to take on trainees, leading to predictions of a looming skills gap. To date, TLEF has funded over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll