header-logo header-logo

20 March 2026 / Robert Hargreaves
Issue: 8154 / Categories: Features , Employment , Family
printer mail-detail

The right to grieve

244929

New reforms go some way towards filling employment law’s long-acknowledged statutory gap, writes Robert Hargreaves

  • The Employment Rights Act 2025 creates a new day-one right to bereavement leave, extended beyond the existing parental bereavement leave scheme to cover the death of a wider category of loved ones.

Much of the commentary surrounding the Employment Rights Act 2025—the most significant overhaul of employment law in a generation—receiving royal assent on 18 December 2025 has focused on headline reforms: the abolition of the two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal, the extension of day-one rights, and the doubling of the protective award for collective redundancy failures. Somewhat overshadowed by these changes is a set of reforms that are, for many workers, of far greater immediate personal significance: the transformation of bereavement leave.

Prior to the Act, statutory bereavement leave was conspicuously narrow. The Parental Bereavement (Leave and Pay) Act 2018, brought into force in April 2020, gave eligible employees two weeks’ paid leave following the death of a child under 18 or a stillbirth

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll