header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Employment
printer mail-detail

The scope of retained EU law: an overview

50388
Charles Pigott explores retained EU law through recent findings from the employment coalface
  • A number of interesting issues in relation to retained EU law have been explored in employment case law over the past few months.

Before examining the first wave of Brexit-related case law in the employment field, it is worth a quick reminder of the overall framework in which our courts have been operating since the beginning of 2021.

At the risk of considerable over-simplification, the key aim of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EUWA 2018) was to leave the UK with a functioning domestic rule book once it had left the EU. To avoid Brexit creating gaping holes in the areas formerly occupied by EU-derived law, the decision was taken to incorporate the whole body of EU legislation and case law that applied at the point of exit and into domestic law. In order to make this snapshot approach work, it was also necessary to cut the legal ‘conduit pipe’ in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll