header-logo header-logo

The scope of retained EU law: an overview

02 June 2021 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Employment
printer mail-detail
50388
Charles Pigott explores retained EU law through recent findings from the employment coalface
  • A number of interesting issues in relation to retained EU law have been explored in employment case law over the past few months.

Before examining the first wave of Brexit-related case law in the employment field, it is worth a quick reminder of the overall framework in which our courts have been operating since the beginning of 2021.

At the risk of considerable over-simplification, the key aim of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EUWA 2018) was to leave the UK with a functioning domestic rule book once it had left the EU. To avoid Brexit creating gaping holes in the areas formerly occupied by EU-derived law, the decision was taken to incorporate the whole body of EU legislation and case law that applied at the point of exit and into domestic law. In order to make this snapshot approach work, it was also necessary to cut the legal ‘conduit pipe’ in the form

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll