header-logo header-logo

The Thompstone effect

11 September 2008 / Hugh Potter , Angela Piears
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

How is Thompstone impacting on periodical payments orders? ask Angela Piears and Hugh Potter

Oladipo Jackson Okeowo was a rear seat passenger in a car driven by the defendant on 6 July 2000 on the Woodhead Road from Holme to Holmbridge when the defendant lost control of the car, and the vehicle hit a dry stone wall. The claimant was male, aged 26 and suffered a severe traumatic brain injury. Now a patient under the court of protection he needs constant nursing care. He is dependant upon the provisions of the financial settlement to meet his care and case management costs for the rest of his life.

On 6 February 2006 Mr Justice Mitting approved an initial agreement which had been achieved between the parties for a lump sum payment of £2.1m and periodical payments of £110,000 a year, the final funding and terms of which were left to be determined at a later date.

The agreement provided that the periodical payments would increase in line with the Retail Prices Index (RPI),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll