header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008 / Hugh Potter , Angela Piears
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The Thompstone effect

How is Thompstone impacting on periodical payments orders? ask Angela Piears and Hugh Potter

Oladipo Jackson Okeowo was a rear seat passenger in a car driven by the defendant on 6 July 2000 on the Woodhead Road from Holme to Holmbridge when the defendant lost control of the car, and the vehicle hit a dry stone wall. The claimant was male, aged 26 and suffered a severe traumatic brain injury. Now a patient under the court of protection he needs constant nursing care. He is dependant upon the provisions of the financial settlement to meet his care and case management costs for the rest of his life.

On 6 February 2006 Mr Justice Mitting approved an initial agreement which had been achieved between the parties for a lump sum payment of £2.1m and periodical payments of £110,000 a year, the final funding and terms of which were left to be determined at a later date.

The agreement provided that the periodical payments would increase in line with the Retail Prices Index (RPI),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll