header-logo header-logo

The three Ps

13 July 2012 / Julian Miller , Sara Robertson
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Profession
printer mail-detail

E-disclosure requires preservation, preparation & proportionality, say Julian Miller & Sara Robertson

It has been 18 months since the introduction of the electronic disclosure practice direction PD31. Since then there have been several cases setting out the implications for practitioners and their clients.

There are three key considerations litigants and their advisers must address. A failure to do so may result in adverse costs orders.

Preservation

Paragraph 7 of PD31 provides: “As soon as litigation is contemplated, the parties’ legal representatives must notify their clients of the need to preserve disclosable documents. The documents to be preserved include electronic documents which would otherwise be deleted in the accordance with a document retention policy or otherwise deleted in the ordinary course of business.”

Good practice now requires that solicitors include an appropriate instruction in their retainer letters, but this will rarely be enough of itself. How often do clients read terms and conditions in full? At an appropriate stage early in any case likely to proceed to litigation, there must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll