header-logo header-logo

The three Ps

13 July 2012 / Julian Miller , Sara Robertson
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Profession
printer mail-detail

E-disclosure requires preservation, preparation & proportionality, say Julian Miller & Sara Robertson

It has been 18 months since the introduction of the electronic disclosure practice direction PD31. Since then there have been several cases setting out the implications for practitioners and their clients.

There are three key considerations litigants and their advisers must address. A failure to do so may result in adverse costs orders.

Preservation

Paragraph 7 of PD31 provides: “As soon as litigation is contemplated, the parties’ legal representatives must notify their clients of the need to preserve disclosable documents. The documents to be preserved include electronic documents which would otherwise be deleted in the accordance with a document retention policy or otherwise deleted in the ordinary course of business.”

Good practice now requires that solicitors include an appropriate instruction in their retainer letters, but this will rarely be enough of itself. How often do clients read terms and conditions in full? At an appropriate stage early in any case likely to proceed to litigation, there must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll