header-logo header-logo

Time for reflection?

28 July 2011 / Dr Ann Brady
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , EU , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Dr Ann Brady considers the role of mediation across the EU

The 2002 European Commission Consultative Paper on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in civil and commercial law initiated a broad-based consultation on a number of legal issues relating to mediation and brought into sharp focus variations between individual member states such as: domestic legislation, or lack of it, regulating the use of mediation; provision of mediation according to the type of legal system operated; the training and regulation of mediators; costs of operating mediation services and who should bear the financial burden. Among a number of major EU initiatives following this consultative paper, two have particular significance: the European Code of Conduct for Mediators and Directive 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters.

Code of Conduct

The European Code of Conduct for Mediators sets out the following principles to which both individual mediators and mediation services providers can voluntarily commit: competence; appointment and advertising of mediators’ services; independence; neutrality of mediators; mediation agreements; fairness of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll