header-logo header-logo

Time up for retirement?

30 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

New EHRC proposals include government-led incentives for employers to offer flexible working for all employees, and government funding for workplace training in age management and flexibility. The House of Lords is currently debating whether to include the default retirement age in the Equality Bill, which could fast-track its removal.

Currently, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 allow employers to compulsorily retire workers at 65. The ruling in the high-profile “Heyday” case, last September, held the default retirement age to be lawful, although the judge, Mr Justice Blake, observed that there was a “compelling” argument for the age to be raised beyond 65. The government will review the default retirement age later this year.

An EHRC survey, Older workers: employment preferences, barriers and solutions, published this week, found 24% of men and 64% of women planned to keep working beyond the state pension age (currently 60 for women and 65 for men). Some 85% of people not working and over the state pension age say greater availability of part-time or flexible jobs would help them gain a job.

Baroness Margaret Prosser, deputy chairman of the EHRC, says: “Our research shows that to provide real opportunity to older workers, abolishing the default retirement age needs to be accompanied by a concerted drive by government, employers and agencies to meet the health, caring and work needs of the over-50s to enable them to remain in the workplace.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll