header-logo header-logo

30 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time up for retirement?

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

New EHRC proposals include government-led incentives for employers to offer flexible working for all employees, and government funding for workplace training in age management and flexibility. The House of Lords is currently debating whether to include the default retirement age in the Equality Bill, which could fast-track its removal.

Currently, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 allow employers to compulsorily retire workers at 65. The ruling in the high-profile “Heyday” case, last September, held the default retirement age to be lawful, although the judge, Mr Justice Blake, observed that there was a “compelling” argument for the age to be raised beyond 65. The government will review the default retirement age later this year.

An EHRC survey, Older workers: employment preferences, barriers and solutions, published this week, found 24% of men and 64% of women planned to keep working beyond the state pension age (currently 60 for women and 65 for men). Some 85% of people not working and over the state pension age say greater availability of part-time or flexible jobs would help them gain a job.

Baroness Margaret Prosser, deputy chairman of the EHRC, says: “Our research shows that to provide real opportunity to older workers, abolishing the default retirement age needs to be accompanied by a concerted drive by government, employers and agencies to meet the health, caring and work needs of the over-50s to enable them to remain in the workplace.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll