header-logo header-logo

Trouble & strife

04 November 2011 / James Harrison
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

James Harrison examines the impact of bankruptcy on marriage

“For better, for worse, for richer, for poorer…” While nobody enters a marriage expecting it all to go wrong, in these rocky times, the threat of bankruptcy is ever present. It is often only at the time of bankruptcy, by this stage too late, that spouses realise how exposed they are to a cold-hearted trustee in bankruptcy selling their home from under them. While it may feel like their life is collapsing like a house of cards, in terms of bricks and mortar, the non-bankrupt spouse’s position requires detailed analysis to ascertain what they own.

Understanding what the spouse owns and how that interest is valued is key whether you are structuring a couple’s affairs when bankruptcy is not an issue, or seeking to protect or assert a beneficial interest in the face of a trustee in bankruptcy investigating the bankrupt spouse’s interest. This article looks at the key legal principles in valuing the non-bankrupt spouse’s interests and the recent legal developments in this ever-evolving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll