header-logo header-logo

04 November 2011 / James Harrison
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Trouble & strife

James Harrison examines the impact of bankruptcy on marriage

“For better, for worse, for richer, for poorer…” While nobody enters a marriage expecting it all to go wrong, in these rocky times, the threat of bankruptcy is ever present. It is often only at the time of bankruptcy, by this stage too late, that spouses realise how exposed they are to a cold-hearted trustee in bankruptcy selling their home from under them. While it may feel like their life is collapsing like a house of cards, in terms of bricks and mortar, the non-bankrupt spouse’s position requires detailed analysis to ascertain what they own.

Understanding what the spouse owns and how that interest is valued is key whether you are structuring a couple’s affairs when bankruptcy is not an issue, or seeking to protect or assert a beneficial interest in the face of a trustee in bankruptcy investigating the bankrupt spouse’s interest. This article looks at the key legal principles in valuing the non-bankrupt spouse’s interests and the recent legal developments in this ever-evolving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll