header-logo header-logo

Trouble & strife

04 November 2011 / James Harrison
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

James Harrison examines the impact of bankruptcy on marriage

“For better, for worse, for richer, for poorer…” While nobody enters a marriage expecting it all to go wrong, in these rocky times, the threat of bankruptcy is ever present. It is often only at the time of bankruptcy, by this stage too late, that spouses realise how exposed they are to a cold-hearted trustee in bankruptcy selling their home from under them. While it may feel like their life is collapsing like a house of cards, in terms of bricks and mortar, the non-bankrupt spouse’s position requires detailed analysis to ascertain what they own.

Understanding what the spouse owns and how that interest is valued is key whether you are structuring a couple’s affairs when bankruptcy is not an issue, or seeking to protect or assert a beneficial interest in the face of a trustee in bankruptcy investigating the bankrupt spouse’s interest. This article looks at the key legal principles in valuing the non-bankrupt spouse’s interests and the recent legal developments in this ever-evolving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll