header-logo header-logo

Trump Card

07 January 2010 / Paul Dacam , Jamie Potter
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Local government accountability beats commercial confidentiality, say Paul Dacam & Jamie Potter

A recent High Court ruling on the interpretation of a legislative provision dating back to the early 19th century is likely to have considerable ramifications for those contracting with local authorities.

In particular, the ruling significantly increases the risk of disclosure of sensitive information provided by contractors to local government authorities, irrespective of any potential commercial prejudice or breach of confidentiality.

The case R (on the application of the Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council [2009] All ER (D) 78 (Oct) involved an application by Veolia for judicial review of the decision of Nottinghamshire County Council (Notts CC) to disclose certain documents relating to a waste management PFI contract between Veolia and Notts CC (the PFI contract) that Veolia had won through a public tender.

The documents in question had been requested by an environmental activist, in his capacity as a local elector, and comprised the payment and performance mechanism and KPI schedules to the PFI contract, as well

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll