header-logo header-logo

Trump Card

07 January 2010 / Paul Dacam , Jamie Potter
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Local government accountability beats commercial confidentiality, say Paul Dacam & Jamie Potter

A recent High Court ruling on the interpretation of a legislative provision dating back to the early 19th century is likely to have considerable ramifications for those contracting with local authorities.

In particular, the ruling significantly increases the risk of disclosure of sensitive information provided by contractors to local government authorities, irrespective of any potential commercial prejudice or breach of confidentiality.

The case R (on the application of the Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council [2009] All ER (D) 78 (Oct) involved an application by Veolia for judicial review of the decision of Nottinghamshire County Council (Notts CC) to disclose certain documents relating to a waste management PFI contract between Veolia and Notts CC (the PFI contract) that Veolia had won through a public tender.

The documents in question had been requested by an environmental activist, in his capacity as a local elector, and comprised the payment and performance mechanism and KPI schedules to the PFI contract, as well

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll