header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / John McMullen
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE or not TUPE

new_image_16_4

Part 2: Collective issues on Tupe Transfers by Dr John McMullen

Under reg 6 of TUPE the transferee must continue the recognition of any independent trade union previously recognised by the transferor in respect of that undertaking or part. That obligation, however, is dependent upon the undertaking or part being transferred retaining a separate identity in the hands of a transferee. The first point to note is reg 6, requiring retention of a separate identity of the undertaking for the purposes of the transfer of representation of employees has different wording from the Acquired Rights Directive.

In contrast with reg 6, Art 6 of the Directive provides for the preservation of representation of employees where the undertaking or business or part of an undertaking or business preserves its autonomy. At first glance it might be thought that the word “identity” in reg 6 should be easily construed in line with “autonomy” but, as the Court of Justice of the European Communities has pointed out in Federación de Servicios Públicos de la UGT (FSP)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll