header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / John McMullen
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE or not TUPE

new_image_16_4

Part 2: Collective issues on Tupe Transfers by Dr John McMullen

Under reg 6 of TUPE the transferee must continue the recognition of any independent trade union previously recognised by the transferor in respect of that undertaking or part. That obligation, however, is dependent upon the undertaking or part being transferred retaining a separate identity in the hands of a transferee. The first point to note is reg 6, requiring retention of a separate identity of the undertaking for the purposes of the transfer of representation of employees has different wording from the Acquired Rights Directive.

In contrast with reg 6, Art 6 of the Directive provides for the preservation of representation of employees where the undertaking or business or part of an undertaking or business preserves its autonomy. At first glance it might be thought that the word “identity” in reg 6 should be easily construed in line with “autonomy” but, as the Court of Justice of the European Communities has pointed out in Federación de Servicios Públicos de la UGT (FSP)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll