header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Alexander Ruck Keene
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Public , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

Two steps forward, one step back

Alexander Ruck Keene considers the role of human rights in the regulation of care professionals

One of the thornier questions in the regulation of care professionals is how to strike the balance between the interest of the public and the interests of the professional when allegations of misconduct are made. Most regulatory regimes provide for suspension on an interim basis while allegations are investigated. Two recent cases have cast light on the operation of those governing two of the most important categories of care professional: doctors and care workers.

 

 

MALIK

The first is R (on the application of Malik) v Waltham Forest NHS Primary Care Trust (Secretary of State for Health, interested party)

 

[2007] EWCA Civ 265, [2007] 4 All ER 832. Dr Malik was a general practitioner providing services to Waltham Forest NHS Primary Care Trust (PCT). He was required by statute to be on a performers’ list maintained by the PCT. He was suspended on full pay in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll