header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Alexander Ruck Keene
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Public , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

Two steps forward, one step back

Alexander Ruck Keene considers the role of human rights in the regulation of care professionals

One of the thornier questions in the regulation of care professionals is how to strike the balance between the interest of the public and the interests of the professional when allegations of misconduct are made. Most regulatory regimes provide for suspension on an interim basis while allegations are investigated. Two recent cases have cast light on the operation of those governing two of the most important categories of care professional: doctors and care workers.

 

 

MALIK

The first is R (on the application of Malik) v Waltham Forest NHS Primary Care Trust (Secretary of State for Health, interested party)

 

[2007] EWCA Civ 265, [2007] 4 All ER 832. Dr Malik was a general practitioner providing services to Waltham Forest NHS Primary Care Trust (PCT). He was required by statute to be on a performers’ list maintained by the PCT. He was suspended on full pay in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll