header-logo header-logo

The two Vladimirs

07 February 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

…and the cloud cuckoo land of legal nit-picking, by Geoffrey Bindman
 

An unusual libel case came my way in the late 1980s. Vladimir Matusevitch had been sued and the trial had taken place in his absence. He was facing a demand for damages of £65,000, plus costs. He became aware of this only when a bailiff called to seize his possessions. I was able to get a stay of execution. Matusevitch was a journalist employed by Radio Free Europe to broadcast to the Soviet Union, where strict control of local media denied the population accurate information about what was going on in the world.

 
RECRUITMENT POLICY
His opponent, Vladimir Telnikoff, had been employed at one time by the BBC Russian Service to do much the same thing. The Daily Telegraph on 18 February 1984 published an article by Telnikoff, “Selecting the Right Wavelength to Tune into Russia”, in which he complained that these Western efforts were ineffective in turning the Russian people against their rulers.
Telnikoff argued
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll