header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The two Vladimirs

…and the cloud cuckoo land of legal nit-picking, by Geoffrey Bindman
 

An unusual libel case came my way in the late 1980s. Vladimir Matusevitch had been sued and the trial had taken place in his absence. He was facing a demand for damages of £65,000, plus costs. He became aware of this only when a bailiff called to seize his possessions. I was able to get a stay of execution. Matusevitch was a journalist employed by Radio Free Europe to broadcast to the Soviet Union, where strict control of local media denied the population accurate information about what was going on in the world.

 
RECRUITMENT POLICY
His opponent, Vladimir Telnikoff, had been employed at one time by the BBC Russian Service to do much the same thing. The Daily Telegraph on 18 February 1984 published an article by Telnikoff, “Selecting the Right Wavelength to Tune into Russia”, in which he complained that these Western efforts were ineffective in turning the Russian people against their rulers.
Telnikoff argued
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll