header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The two Vladimirs

…and the cloud cuckoo land of legal nit-picking, by Geoffrey Bindman
 

An unusual libel case came my way in the late 1980s. Vladimir Matusevitch had been sued and the trial had taken place in his absence. He was facing a demand for damages of £65,000, plus costs. He became aware of this only when a bailiff called to seize his possessions. I was able to get a stay of execution. Matusevitch was a journalist employed by Radio Free Europe to broadcast to the Soviet Union, where strict control of local media denied the population accurate information about what was going on in the world.

 
RECRUITMENT POLICY
His opponent, Vladimir Telnikoff, had been employed at one time by the BBC Russian Service to do much the same thing. The Daily Telegraph on 18 February 1984 published an article by Telnikoff, “Selecting the Right Wavelength to Tune into Russia”, in which he complained that these Western efforts were ineffective in turning the Russian people against their rulers.
Telnikoff argued
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll