header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

UK firms fail to shine in league tables

News

Four UK firms bagged top 10 spots in Mergermarket’s global M&A league tables for law firms, released this week.

Freshfields, Clifford Chance, Allen & Overy and Linklaters come third to sixth respectively, with US-based Sullivan & Cromwell and Skadden Arps taking the top two spots globally.

The tables, based on announced transactions over US$5m from 1 January–31 December 2007, show that US firms remain in the ascendancy: London-based firms comprise just five of the top 20 positions globally and only Freshfields and Clifford Chance appear in the North American M&A tables, ranking 16th and 17th respectively.

Andre Sawyer, Mergermarket EMEA managing editor, says the “average deal size criterion” is telling, suggesting the predominance of US law firms amid large cap, trans-Atlantic activity.

“Sullivan & Cromwell’s average deal size of about €7.4bn was more than double that of the best placed UK firm by this measure, Herbert Smith, Gleiss Lutz and Stibbe with a deal size of €2.7bn.”
Whether the US law firms manage to hold onto their positions in 2008, he says, depends on whether the recent surge in UK-to-US M&A activity continues.

“If the corporates continue to take advantage of the cheap dollar then we would expect US firms to consolidate their top 10 positions,” he adds.

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll