header-logo header-logo

UK’s hopes fade for Lugano

14 April 2021
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail
Lawyers' hopes for the Lugano Convention crumbled to disappointment this week, amid reports the European Commission is opposed to the UK's accession.

Anticipation of a positive result for the UK was rising ahead of a meeting this week between the Commission and member states. According to the FT, however, the Commission has said it will not back the UK’s application to join.

A final decision, expected in the next few weeks, requires the unanimous approval of all member states.

The 2007 Convention clarifies which national courts have jurisdiction in cross-border civil and commercial disputes and ensures judgments are enforceable across borders. It means consumers and suppliers can seek redress in their local court rather than raising multiple cases in different jurisdictions.

David Greene, senior partner, Edwin Coe, said: ‘This was predicted, so it was a surprise when the indications earlier this week were to the contrary.

‘Unfortunately, some within the EU have seen Lugano as an instrument in the competition for global dispute resolution and this seems to have influenced events. In fact, it’s a vital instrument for businesses of all sizes in the EU and UK and for consumers and citizens. All will lose out.

‘In the event, however, delay in or no accession will not affect London as a global legal centre in the long run. To the contrary the consequent development of English law may indeed enhance the jurisdiction.’

Sara Chisholm-Batten, partner at Michelmores, said the news was ‘a real setback’ for UK businesses and individuals.

‘If the UK is accepted into Lugano, it would result in judgments being recognised and enforced across UK and EU/EFTA borders much more swiftly and cost effectively―which would be welcome news for UK businesses trading in those areas―and EU businesses trading in the UK,’ she said.

Lauren Cormack, associate at Russell-Cooke, said: ‘Cross-border disputes may become difficult to resolve efficiently.

‘This may create a barrier preventing access to justice for those who cannot meet the increased costs of what will be much more complex litigation. This will be felt most acutely by individuals, consumers and small and medium-sized enterprises involved in cross-border trade and transactions.’

Issue: 7928 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll