header-logo header-logo

Ukraine: SLAPPing down on sanctions

20 May 2022 / Tom Bedford , Christopher Dyke
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail
Tom Bedford & Chris Dyke examine the regulatory consequences for firms arising from the war in Ukraine
  • Firms would be well-advised to stay abreast of SRA sanctions guidance and ensure they are complying with their obligations, particularly where there are money laundering or sanctions risks in continuing to act for an individual.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has prompted some in the profession to consider whether it is right to accept instructions which may be contrary to their own values, or those of society. What about those firms who say that the rule of law entitles everyone to legal representation? Can they continue to do so without fear of consequences? On top of that, how have firms responded to the new sanctions rules? Can firms continue to act for Russian nationals?

Certain parts of the profession have a reputation for acting for Russian oligarchs, with access to sufficient financial resources to enable them to use English jurisdiction to further their interests both here and abroad.

We are sure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll