header-logo header-logo

20 May 2022 / Tom Bedford , Christopher Dyke
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail

Ukraine: SLAPPing down on sanctions

Tom Bedford & Chris Dyke examine the regulatory consequences for firms arising from the war in Ukraine
  • Firms would be well-advised to stay abreast of SRA sanctions guidance and ensure they are complying with their obligations, particularly where there are money laundering or sanctions risks in continuing to act for an individual.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has prompted some in the profession to consider whether it is right to accept instructions which may be contrary to their own values, or those of society. What about those firms who say that the rule of law entitles everyone to legal representation? Can they continue to do so without fear of consequences? On top of that, how have firms responded to the new sanctions rules? Can firms continue to act for Russian nationals?

Certain parts of the profession have a reputation for acting for Russian oligarchs, with access to sufficient financial resources to enable them to use English jurisdiction to further their interests both here and abroad.

We are sure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll