header-logo header-logo

Ukraine: SLAPPing down on sanctions

20 May 2022 / Tom Bedford , Christopher Dyke
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail
Tom Bedford & Chris Dyke examine the regulatory consequences for firms arising from the war in Ukraine
  • Firms would be well-advised to stay abreast of SRA sanctions guidance and ensure they are complying with their obligations, particularly where there are money laundering or sanctions risks in continuing to act for an individual.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has prompted some in the profession to consider whether it is right to accept instructions which may be contrary to their own values, or those of society. What about those firms who say that the rule of law entitles everyone to legal representation? Can they continue to do so without fear of consequences? On top of that, how have firms responded to the new sanctions rules? Can firms continue to act for Russian nationals?

Certain parts of the profession have a reputation for acting for Russian oligarchs, with access to sufficient financial resources to enable them to use English jurisdiction to further their interests both here and abroad.

We are sure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll