header-logo header-logo

Ukraine: SLAPPing down on sanctions

20 May 2022 / Tom Bedford , Christopher Dyke
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail
Tom Bedford & Chris Dyke examine the regulatory consequences for firms arising from the war in Ukraine
  • Firms would be well-advised to stay abreast of SRA sanctions guidance and ensure they are complying with their obligations, particularly where there are money laundering or sanctions risks in continuing to act for an individual.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has prompted some in the profession to consider whether it is right to accept instructions which may be contrary to their own values, or those of society. What about those firms who say that the rule of law entitles everyone to legal representation? Can they continue to do so without fear of consequences? On top of that, how have firms responded to the new sanctions rules? Can firms continue to act for Russian nationals?

Certain parts of the profession have a reputation for acting for Russian oligarchs, with access to sufficient financial resources to enable them to use English jurisdiction to further their interests both here and abroad.

We are sure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll