header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Under review

Nichola Evans investigates the reign of uncertainty surrounding success fees

While interested parties have been busy preparing their responses to the government Green Paper on civil costs, the courts have themselves been reviewing the question of success fees. Two cases, one decided in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the other in the Technology and Construction Court, contain heavy criticism of the current system and pose a number of issues for both claimants and defendants who operate in the “no win, no fee” arena.

MGN v United Kingdom (Case No 39401/04)

This is a case which has already garnered a considerable degree of media attention over the past few years.

The claim dates back to 2001 after the Daily Mirror newspaper revealed that the supermodel Naomi Campbell was receiving treatment for drug abuse. Proceedings were brought by Ms Campbell against the Mirror Group which concerned the primary issue as to whether or not that by publishing its story, MGN Limited breached the privacy of Naomi Campbell.  

In the High Court and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll