header-logo header-logo

Under review

03 March 2011 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Nichola Evans investigates the reign of uncertainty surrounding success fees

While interested parties have been busy preparing their responses to the government Green Paper on civil costs, the courts have themselves been reviewing the question of success fees. Two cases, one decided in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the other in the Technology and Construction Court, contain heavy criticism of the current system and pose a number of issues for both claimants and defendants who operate in the “no win, no fee” arena.

MGN v United Kingdom (Case No 39401/04)

This is a case which has already garnered a considerable degree of media attention over the past few years.

The claim dates back to 2001 after the Daily Mirror newspaper revealed that the supermodel Naomi Campbell was receiving treatment for drug abuse. Proceedings were brought by Ms Campbell against the Mirror Group which concerned the primary issue as to whether or not that by publishing its story, MGN Limited breached the privacy of Naomi Campbell.  

In the High Court and in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll