header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Under review

Nichola Evans investigates the reign of uncertainty surrounding success fees

While interested parties have been busy preparing their responses to the government Green Paper on civil costs, the courts have themselves been reviewing the question of success fees. Two cases, one decided in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the other in the Technology and Construction Court, contain heavy criticism of the current system and pose a number of issues for both claimants and defendants who operate in the “no win, no fee” arena.

MGN v United Kingdom (Case No 39401/04)

This is a case which has already garnered a considerable degree of media attention over the past few years.

The claim dates back to 2001 after the Daily Mirror newspaper revealed that the supermodel Naomi Campbell was receiving treatment for drug abuse. Proceedings were brought by Ms Campbell against the Mirror Group which concerned the primary issue as to whether or not that by publishing its story, MGN Limited breached the privacy of Naomi Campbell.  

In the High Court and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll