header-logo header-logo

08 August 2014 / Elizabeth Cooke , Luke Campbell
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Under review

specialist_wills-probate_law-comm

Professor Cooke & Luke Campbell report on the forthcoming Law Commission project on the law of wills

On the 23 July 2014 the Law Commission published its Twelfth Programme of Law Reform (Law Com No 354). The programme is the result of an extensive public consultation, and sets out the Commission’s law reform agenda for the next three years. During this period the Commission will undertake a variety of work, including a project on the law of wills.

The call for the Commission to review the law of wills was widespread. A number of legal representative bodies, legal practitioners, and parliamentarians, both in England and Wales, highlighted the need for reform. The main areas of concern for consultees are discussed below.

Testamentary capacity

Testamentary capacity is still assessed by reference to the criteria in Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549. The testator must be able to understand what it means to make a will, and have an appreciation of what he or she will be leaving by will and of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll