header-logo header-logo

02 September 2022 / Tom Bedford
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Undertakings—manage your risks

92331
Tom Bedford looks at the impact of Harcus Sinclair on solicitors’ undertakings
  • Covers Harcus Sinclair and its impact on solicitors’ undertakings.
  • Looks at problems and potential solutions to fact only individual solicitors and not incorporated bodies can give a binding undertaking.

Solicitors’ undertakings are rightly often a source of nervousness for practitioners. No solicitor would ever want to be in breach of an undertaking they have given, particularly if that undertaking binds them personally.

There are three main ways in which an undertaking can be enforced:

  • through an action using the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction over solicitors;
  • through civil proceedings for specific performance or compensation. This can be more difficult and costly; and
  • by means of a report to the Solicitors Regulation Authority whose powers can be used to compel compliance with an undertaking, not by making an order to force compliance but through the use of sanctions.

It is the first of these enforcement routes, which is often the quickest and most effective way to secure compliance, that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll