header-logo header-logo

Undertakings—manage your risks

02 September 2022 / Tom Bedford
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
92331
Tom Bedford looks at the impact of Harcus Sinclair on solicitors’ undertakings
  • Covers Harcus Sinclair and its impact on solicitors’ undertakings.
  • Looks at problems and potential solutions to fact only individual solicitors and not incorporated bodies can give a binding undertaking.

Solicitors’ undertakings are rightly often a source of nervousness for practitioners. No solicitor would ever want to be in breach of an undertaking they have given, particularly if that undertaking binds them personally.

There are three main ways in which an undertaking can be enforced:

  • through an action using the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction over solicitors;
  • through civil proceedings for specific performance or compensation. This can be more difficult and costly; and
  • by means of a report to the Solicitors Regulation Authority whose powers can be used to compel compliance with an undertaking, not by making an order to force compliance but through the use of sanctions.

It is the first of these enforcement routes, which is often the quickest and most effective way to secure compliance, that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll