header-logo header-logo

Undertakings—manage your risks

02 September 2022 / Tom Bedford
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
92331
Tom Bedford looks at the impact of Harcus Sinclair on solicitors’ undertakings
  • Covers Harcus Sinclair and its impact on solicitors’ undertakings.
  • Looks at problems and potential solutions to fact only individual solicitors and not incorporated bodies can give a binding undertaking.

Solicitors’ undertakings are rightly often a source of nervousness for practitioners. No solicitor would ever want to be in breach of an undertaking they have given, particularly if that undertaking binds them personally.

There are three main ways in which an undertaking can be enforced:

  • through an action using the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction over solicitors;
  • through civil proceedings for specific performance or compensation. This can be more difficult and costly; and
  • by means of a report to the Solicitors Regulation Authority whose powers can be used to compel compliance with an undertaking, not by making an order to force compliance but through the use of sanctions.

It is the first of these enforcement routes, which is often the quickest and most effective way to secure compliance, that has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll