header-logo header-logo

Union discriminated against female members

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Legal news update

A trade union unlawfully discriminated against some of its female members when it opted not to pursue a better pay deal for them, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

The appeal court ruled in Allen v GMB, that GMB indirectly discriminated against female staff at Middlesbrough Borough Council when it recommended that members accept an equal pay deal, even though it undervalued the women’s claims. The union feared that if the women successfully claimed for the back pay they believed they were entitled to when compared with a group of predominantly male employees, it would threaten negotiations for pay rises for all its members.

Overturning an earlier judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the court held that the union had misrepresented to the women the nature of the deal which was on offer from their employers. Although the aim of securing a fair single status pay deal was legitimate, the court said, the way the union secured the deal was not done in a proportionate manner. The case will now return to the employment tribunal where compensation levels will be assessed.

Macfarlanes solicitor James Baker says: “This is extremely damning, and potentially very expensive, for the GMB. We can expect similar pay deals to come under the judicial microscope as a result.”

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll