header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Union discriminated against female members

Legal news update

A trade union unlawfully discriminated against some of its female members when it opted not to pursue a better pay deal for them, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

The appeal court ruled in Allen v GMB, that GMB indirectly discriminated against female staff at Middlesbrough Borough Council when it recommended that members accept an equal pay deal, even though it undervalued the women’s claims. The union feared that if the women successfully claimed for the back pay they believed they were entitled to when compared with a group of predominantly male employees, it would threaten negotiations for pay rises for all its members.

Overturning an earlier judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the court held that the union had misrepresented to the women the nature of the deal which was on offer from their employers. Although the aim of securing a fair single status pay deal was legitimate, the court said, the way the union secured the deal was not done in a proportionate manner. The case will now return to the employment tribunal where compensation levels will be assessed.

Macfarlanes solicitor James Baker says: “This is extremely damning, and potentially very expensive, for the GMB. We can expect similar pay deals to come under the judicial microscope as a result.”

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll