header-logo header-logo

Unravelling exit deals

11 June 2009 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

When can employers wriggle out of paying termination agreements? Charles Pigott reports

As the cause célèbre of Sir Fred (“the Shred”) Goodwin illustrates in a slightly different context, it is normally too late to renege on a promise once a formal commitment has been made. But two recent cases involving compromise agreements show that, as with most rules, there can be exceptions.

Outraged of Tunbridge Wells

Nearly two years ago a severe outbreak of the “superbug” c difficile at hospitals managed by the Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust led to the departure of its chief executive Rose Gibb. She agreed to accept the immediate ending of her employment in return for a termination payment totalling around £250,000. She entered into a compromise agreement to that effect, but before the money was paid over, the Department of Health intervened to stop the payment. A payment of £75,000 in respect of her contractual notice entitlement was subsequently authorised, but the rest of the money was not paid. Ms Gibb brought proceedings against the trust to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll