header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Unravelling exit deals

When can employers wriggle out of paying termination agreements? Charles Pigott reports

As the cause célèbre of Sir Fred (“the Shred”) Goodwin illustrates in a slightly different context, it is normally too late to renege on a promise once a formal commitment has been made. But two recent cases involving compromise agreements show that, as with most rules, there can be exceptions.

Outraged of Tunbridge Wells

Nearly two years ago a severe outbreak of the “superbug” c difficile at hospitals managed by the Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust led to the departure of its chief executive Rose Gibb. She agreed to accept the immediate ending of her employment in return for a termination payment totalling around £250,000. She entered into a compromise agreement to that effect, but before the money was paid over, the Department of Health intervened to stop the payment. A payment of £75,000 in respect of her contractual notice entitlement was subsequently authorised, but the rest of the money was not paid. Ms Gibb brought proceedings against the trust to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll