header-logo header-logo

Vicarious liability & work experience

06 October 2023 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8043 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
141489
Nicholas Dobson reviews a recent case involving wrongdoing during a one-week work experience stint
  • Considers vicarious liability where the individual concerned is on work experience.
  • Covers the case of MXX v A Secondary school.

A vicar (ultimately from Latin vicarius (substitute)) is an earthly representative of God. Similarly, the adjective vicarious describes someone or something taking the place of another. Vicarious liability, therefore, is legal liability imposed on one person for the legal wrongdoings of another, even though the person vicariously liable is not personally responsible. An employer will consequently be liable for the torts committed by an employee in the course of their employment. But what of work-experience in this context? This issue was recently considered by the Court of Appeal in MXX v A Secondary School [2023] EWCA Civ 996, judgment in which was given in August 2023 by Lady Justice Nicola Davies, with whom Lords Justice Lewison and Jackson agreed.

Background

The respondent was a co-educational secondary school providing education for children aged 11 to 16. In December

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll