header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Wage enforcement required

Service industry under pressure to meet minimum wage standards

The government may face difficulty in enforcing a ban on employers using tips and service charges to meet the national minimum wage, say lawyers.

Speaking at the 10th anniversary of the introduction of the minimum wage, Business Secretary John Hutton announced that the government intends to close the loophole allowing service industries to use tips to supplement wages to bring them in line with the statutory minimum. Hutton said: “When people leave a tip, in a restaurant or elsewhere, they expect it to go to service staff and as consumers, we’ve got a right to know if that actually happens.”

Diane Parker, partner at Atherton Godfrey solicitors, says: “The government, whilst well meaning, with may well have difficulty enforcing these proposed changes, other than leaving it to employees to enforce their own rights in the employment tribunal.”

Parker says that most breaches are picked up by HM Customs and Revenue for PAYE purposes, with those found guilty being made subject to fines and prosecutions. Difficulties exist, however, in identifying where employees are receiving tips in addition to the national minimum wage because the employer is putting the tips through the PAYE system.

“Given that many who work in service industries where tips are commonplace, tend to be short term, often new immigrants or even those working on visas, leaving them to take their case to employment tribunals as the only enforcement method will continue to leave such employees vulnerable to abuse, because either they are not aware of or are unable to seek advice on their rights,” Parker adds.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll