header-logo header-logo

Waging war

09 December 2011 / David Renton
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

David Renton examines how disputes over immigration status affect unlawful deduction of wages claims

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Okuoimose v City Facilities [2011] UKEAT/0192/11/DA casts fresh light on the relationship between immigration status and employment law.

It has long been the law that where an employee has no right to work in the UK he cannot succeed in a claim of unfair dismissal. The employer’s defence has been widened recently, so that a dismissal may be fair even where the employer actually, but wrongly, believes that a worker does not have the right to work in the UK (Klusova v London Borough of Hounslow [2007] EWCA Civ 1127, [2007] All ER (D) 105 (Nov)).

The fairness or otherwise of such a dismissal will depend on the particular facts of the case, for example, how much enquiry did the employer make before dismissal? Did the employer give the employee every opportunity to show that its belief was wrong?

Kurumuth

In an important decision of the EAT in Kurumuth

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll