header-logo header-logo

Welcome relief

17 February 2015 / Ian Smith
Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Ian Smith reports on basic & immutable problems of employment law that require complex answers

There are times where there is comfort to be gained from the bog-standard. In a month when we have been bombarded with regulations on shared parental leave which are so voluminous and complicated that a little light relief can be sought from reading Magna Carta in the original, it is nice to see three recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases on very basic and immutable problems of employment law. These are the effect of a successful internal appeal against dismissal, the effect of continuing to receive sick pay from the employer when deciding whether to leave and claim constructive dismissal and how to decide on the “place of work” of a mobile employee. Although these are simple questions to state, fortunately for lawyers and their bank balances they can demand more complex answers.

The effect of a successful appeal against dismissal

Cases on the contractual status of internal disciplinary procedures tend to revolve around whether they are or are not incorporated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll