header-logo header-logo

17 February 2015 / Ian Smith
Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Welcome relief

Ian Smith reports on basic & immutable problems of employment law that require complex answers

There are times where there is comfort to be gained from the bog-standard. In a month when we have been bombarded with regulations on shared parental leave which are so voluminous and complicated that a little light relief can be sought from reading Magna Carta in the original, it is nice to see three recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases on very basic and immutable problems of employment law. These are the effect of a successful internal appeal against dismissal, the effect of continuing to receive sick pay from the employer when deciding whether to leave and claim constructive dismissal and how to decide on the “place of work” of a mobile employee. Although these are simple questions to state, fortunately for lawyers and their bank balances they can demand more complex answers.

The effect of a successful appeal against dismissal

Cases on the contractual status of internal disciplinary procedures tend to revolve around whether they are or are not incorporated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll