header-logo header-logo

17 February 2015 / Ian Smith
Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Welcome relief

Ian Smith reports on basic & immutable problems of employment law that require complex answers

There are times where there is comfort to be gained from the bog-standard. In a month when we have been bombarded with regulations on shared parental leave which are so voluminous and complicated that a little light relief can be sought from reading Magna Carta in the original, it is nice to see three recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases on very basic and immutable problems of employment law. These are the effect of a successful internal appeal against dismissal, the effect of continuing to receive sick pay from the employer when deciding whether to leave and claim constructive dismissal and how to decide on the “place of work” of a mobile employee. Although these are simple questions to state, fortunately for lawyers and their bank balances they can demand more complex answers.

The effect of a successful appeal against dismissal

Cases on the contractual status of internal disciplinary procedures tend to revolve around whether they are or are not incorporated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll