header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistle-blowing set to soar in the City

Employment

Employment lawyers are predicting a rise in City workers bringing claims against their employers for breaching whistle-blower protection laws.

The number of employees claiming they have been sacked or disciplined for blowing the whistle on malpractice at work has soared in the last few years and is likely to rise further because of the economic downturn, says Jon Taylor, head of employment law at EMW Picton Howell.

Employment tribunals can award unlimited damages for breaches of whistle-blower protection laws, whereas unfair dismissal claims are capped. According to government figures, the number of tribunal cases where employees claimed to have been penalised for whistle-blowing rose 31% last year to 1,356 cases. Taylor says: “In the last two years we have seen the number of whistle-blowing claims almost triple.

“The reputational, as well as the financial, costs of such a claim could be disastrous for companies. We should see an increase in cases where City workers claim to have blown the whistle on irresponsible or unlawful sales, trading or risk management activities.

“However, whistle-blowing is not solely limited to cases of financial irregularity or criminal offences, as many people think. The scope of the legislation is so wide that it can encompass a huge range of ‘offences’. For example, staff can report employers for breach of any legal obligation, which could include breach of contract for failing to pay a bonus or breach of health and safety or harassment laws for failure to protect an employee who reports stress or bullying.”

Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll