header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistle-blowing set to soar in the City

Employment

Employment lawyers are predicting a rise in City workers bringing claims against their employers for breaching whistle-blower protection laws.

The number of employees claiming they have been sacked or disciplined for blowing the whistle on malpractice at work has soared in the last few years and is likely to rise further because of the economic downturn, says Jon Taylor, head of employment law at EMW Picton Howell.

Employment tribunals can award unlimited damages for breaches of whistle-blower protection laws, whereas unfair dismissal claims are capped. According to government figures, the number of tribunal cases where employees claimed to have been penalised for whistle-blowing rose 31% last year to 1,356 cases. Taylor says: “In the last two years we have seen the number of whistle-blowing claims almost triple.

“The reputational, as well as the financial, costs of such a claim could be disastrous for companies. We should see an increase in cases where City workers claim to have blown the whistle on irresponsible or unlawful sales, trading or risk management activities.

“However, whistle-blowing is not solely limited to cases of financial irregularity or criminal offences, as many people think. The scope of the legislation is so wide that it can encompass a huge range of ‘offences’. For example, staff can report employers for breach of any legal obligation, which could include breach of contract for failing to pay a bonus or breach of health and safety or harassment laws for failure to protect an employee who reports stress or bullying.”

Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll