header-logo header-logo

Whistle-blowing set to soar in the City

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment

Employment lawyers are predicting a rise in City workers bringing claims against their employers for breaching whistle-blower protection laws.

The number of employees claiming they have been sacked or disciplined for blowing the whistle on malpractice at work has soared in the last few years and is likely to rise further because of the economic downturn, says Jon Taylor, head of employment law at EMW Picton Howell.

Employment tribunals can award unlimited damages for breaches of whistle-blower protection laws, whereas unfair dismissal claims are capped. According to government figures, the number of tribunal cases where employees claimed to have been penalised for whistle-blowing rose 31% last year to 1,356 cases. Taylor says: “In the last two years we have seen the number of whistle-blowing claims almost triple.

“The reputational, as well as the financial, costs of such a claim could be disastrous for companies. We should see an increase in cases where City workers claim to have blown the whistle on irresponsible or unlawful sales, trading or risk management activities.

“However, whistle-blowing is not solely limited to cases of financial irregularity or criminal offences, as many people think. The scope of the legislation is so wide that it can encompass a huge range of ‘offences’. For example, staff can report employers for breach of any legal obligation, which could include breach of contract for failing to pay a bonus or breach of health and safety or harassment laws for failure to protect an employee who reports stress or bullying.”

Issue: 7346 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll