header-logo header-logo

Who in corporate law is my neighbour?

18 August 2016 / Bill Davies
Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Tortious claims against parent companies examined by Bill Davies

  • Parent companies domiciled in the UK are increasingly likely to face litigation in the UK courts due to the activities of foreign subsidiaries.
  • Separate legal personality and limited liability no defence from traditional principles of tort liability.
  • Recent case law indicates that arguments of forum non conveniens are ineffective in this context.

The recent judgment in the case of Lungowe and others v Vedanta Resources PLC and another [2016] EWHC 975 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 60 (Jun) is illuminating regarding the potential liability in tort that a parent company in the UK can incur as the result of the activities of a subsidiary domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction. Although the hearing itself was an interlocutory application relating to where the substantive claims should be tried; the dismissal of the applications by Mr Justice Coulson and his reasoning in allowing the litigation to continue in the courts of England and Wales are indicative of the potential ambit of tort claims against parent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll