header-logo header-logo

04 November 2016 / Bill Davies
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Who is my neighbour?

Tortious claims against parent companies examined by Bill Davies

  • Parent companies domiciled in the UK are increasingly likely to face litigation in the UK courts due to the activities of foreign subsidiaries.
  • Separate legal personality and limited liability no defence from traditional principles of tort liability.
  • Recent case law indicates that arguments of forum non conveniens are ineffective in this context.

The recent judgment in the case of Lungowe and others v Vedanta Resources PLC and another [2016] EWHC 975 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 60 (Jun) is illuminating regarding the potential liability in tort that a parent company in the UK can incur as the result of the activities of a subsidiary domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction. Although the hearing itself was an interlocutory application relating to where the substantive claims should be tried; the dismissal of the applications by Mr Justice Coulson and his reasoning in allowing the litigation to continue in the courts of England and Wales are indicative of the potential ambit of tort claims against parent companies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll