header-logo header-logo

04 November 2016 / Bill Davies
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Who is my neighbour?

Tortious claims against parent companies examined by Bill Davies

  • Parent companies domiciled in the UK are increasingly likely to face litigation in the UK courts due to the activities of foreign subsidiaries.
  • Separate legal personality and limited liability no defence from traditional principles of tort liability.
  • Recent case law indicates that arguments of forum non conveniens are ineffective in this context.

The recent judgment in the case of Lungowe and others v Vedanta Resources PLC and another [2016] EWHC 975 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 60 (Jun) is illuminating regarding the potential liability in tort that a parent company in the UK can incur as the result of the activities of a subsidiary domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction. Although the hearing itself was an interlocutory application relating to where the substantive claims should be tried; the dismissal of the applications by Mr Justice Coulson and his reasoning in allowing the litigation to continue in the courts of England and Wales are indicative of the potential ambit of tort claims against parent companies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll