header-logo header-logo

​Widening the net

02 October 2015 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
web_pigott_2

An ECJ ruling has extended the scope of indirect discrimination across the EU. Charles Pigott reports

At first sight the scenario in CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria AD v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia C-83/14, [2015] All ER (D) 302 (Jul) may seem remote to those with an interest in UK discrimination law. It concerns a claim brought by a Bulgarian shopkeeper to challenge the arrangements for the supply of electricity in the Gizdova Mahala district of the Bulgarian town of Dupnitsa, where her business was located. That district has a particular high concentration of people of Roma origin, and for many years it had been the practice of the electricity supply company to locate meters on concrete pylons at a height of over six metres, rather than following its normal practice of fixing them at head height. The interest of this case for UK readers lies in the fact the complainant Ms Nikolova was not herself of Roma origin, though she was affected by the practice because she operated her business in the district and did

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll