header-logo header-logo

Widow’s peak

29 April 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

“Life must be lived forwards, but can only be understood backwards.”

This update deals with two recent decisions under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act), both of which were brought by widows who were unsuccessful in their claims.

Kebbeh v Farmer

Kebbeh v Farmer [2015] EWHC 3827 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 257 (Dec) addressed the question of domicile in a spouse 1975 Act claim.

Malcolm Mitchell had a domicile of origin in England, where he was married and had two daughters. By 1994 this marriage had been dissolved and he was based primarily in Gambia.

In 1999 he met the claimant, Haddy Kebbeh, a Gambian citizen 30 years his junior. They married in a Muslim ceremony in 2000 and Mitchell’s third child, Jennifer, was born in England in 2001. There were difficulties in the marriage from a relatively early stage. On 5 May 2006 Mr Mitchell made a will leaving his residuary estate to be divided equally between

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll