header-logo header-logo

Widow’s peak

29 April 2016 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

“Life must be lived forwards, but can only be understood backwards.”

This update deals with two recent decisions under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act), both of which were brought by widows who were unsuccessful in their claims.

Kebbeh v Farmer

Kebbeh v Farmer [2015] EWHC 3827 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 257 (Dec) addressed the question of domicile in a spouse 1975 Act claim.

Malcolm Mitchell had a domicile of origin in England, where he was married and had two daughters. By 1994 this marriage had been dissolved and he was based primarily in Gambia.

In 1999 he met the claimant, Haddy Kebbeh, a Gambian citizen 30 years his junior. They married in a Muslim ceremony in 2000 and Mitchell’s third child, Jennifer, was born in England in 2001. There were difficulties in the marriage from a relatively early stage. On 5 May 2006 Mr Mitchell made a will leaving his residuary estate to be divided equally between

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll