header-logo header-logo

19 August 2022
Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Will the ‘scale-up’ visa make a difference?

The Home Office is launching a ‘scale-up’ visa route next week to help businesses recruit highly skilled employees

The two-year visa, available from 22 August, is aimed at ‘scale-ups’―young, fast-growing, innovation-driven companies, as opposed to ‘start-ups’, which are recently established companies with potential to grow. To qualify, scale-ups should have a turnover or growth rate of more than 20% for the past three years and have at least ten employees at the start of the three-year period.

According to employment and immigration lawyer Gillian McKearney, senior associate, Fieldfisher, the individual will need to be sponsored for the first six months only and must be in a highly skilled role, earning at least £33,000 per year and at least £10.58 per hour.

Joanna Hunt, head of immigration at Fieldfisher, said: ‘With the headlines still dominated by stories of industry sectors struggling to source talent, the news of another launch of a new visa by the government would appear to offer some welcome relief.

‘However, the Scale Up visa is unlikely to have a major impact on companies facing recruitment challenges, particularly those who need to recruit low skilled workers.’

Hunt said the application process would be ‘less onerous’ than other sponsor licence applications but was still ‘a time and cost commitment which inhibits how responsive an employer can be when they have a new candidate they want to hire.

‘The other big issue with the scale up visa is that it will allow a visa holder to become “unsponsored” within six months, meaning they can freely move to any other employer. This will potentially attract applicants who want that freedom but is unlikely to be popular with employers who may lose workers they have invested time and money to onboard.

‘It is also likely to mean a greater use of clawback clauses in employment contracts by employers to try and recoup visa costs from workers who leave a business early to try and incentivise them to stay. But the increased use of clawbacks is controversial as it could lead to workers being exploited by underhand employers.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll